Passage Summary: A critic argues that we shouldn't try to find deep meanings in any books because doing so stops us from actually feeling the story.

Conclusion: The distinction between 'literary' and 'genre' fiction is false and misleading.

Reasoning: No work should be interpreted for themes because focusing on those abstract ideas prevents the reader from experiencing the work's emotional impact.

Analysis: The statement in question is a premise used to support the idea that 'no work should be [interpreted].' This idea, in turn, is used to debunk the distinction between literary and genre fiction. Therefore, the statement is a foundational piece of evidence for the critic's broader argument. When identifying its role, look for a description that labels it as a reason offered in support of the critic's rejection of the standard view.