Passage Summary: Annette thinks Sefu should take the town council on a field trip to convince them to approve his plan, but Sefu is worried that paying for their travel would look like he's trying to buy their votes.

Reasoning: Annette suggests that Sefu should fund a trip for the town council to see successful developments, while Sefu argues that his personal stake in the outcome makes such a gift appear unethical.

Analysis: In this Point at Issue question, we need to find the specific point where the two speakers' opinions diverge. Use the 'Agree/Disagree' test: Annette clearly believes the trip is a viable and recommended strategy for persuasion, whereas Sefu believes the trip is inappropriate due to the appearance of a conflict of interest. Look for an answer choice that captures this disagreement over whether Sefu should actually carry out the suggested trip. It's a classic case of 'good marketing' versus 'bad ethics'—or at least the appearance of it.