Sufficient AssumptionDiff: Hard
Logic Breakdown
Passage Summary: A company uses a disclaimer to protect itself, but the author says it's useless because it doesn't work if the company actually tells a client to do something illegal.
Conclusion: The legal disclaimer used by the tax preparation company serves no purpose.
Reasoning: The disclaimer's only possible function is legal protection, but it fails to provide that protection if the email actually contains suggestions for illegal activity.
Analysis: There is a significant logical gap regarding when the disclaimer is used. The author concludes the disclaimer is *always* useless based on the fact that it is useless in cases where the advice is illegal. For this to be a 'guaranteed' conclusion, we must assume that the disclaimer is *only* included in emails that suggest illegal acts, or that it provides no protection even in legal cases. Look for an assumption that bridges the gap between 'useless in illegal scenarios' and 'useless in all scenarios.'
Conclusion: The legal disclaimer used by the tax preparation company serves no purpose.
Reasoning: The disclaimer's only possible function is legal protection, but it fails to provide that protection if the email actually contains suggestions for illegal activity.
Analysis: There is a significant logical gap regarding when the disclaimer is used. The author concludes the disclaimer is *always* useless based on the fact that it is useless in cases where the advice is illegal. For this to be a 'guaranteed' conclusion, we must assume that the disclaimer is *only* included in emails that suggest illegal acts, or that it provides no protection even in legal cases. Look for an assumption that bridges the gap between 'useless in illegal scenarios' and 'useless in all scenarios.'
Passage Stimulus
Passage Redacted
Unlock Full Passage22.The argument's conclusion can be properly drawn if which one of the following is assumed?
Correct Answer
A
A supplies the missing case: if an e-mail does not suggest anything illegal, then the company does not need legal protection. Together with the given premise that the disclaimer doesn’t protect when the e-mail does suggest illegality, the conclusion that the disclaimer serves no purpose is properly derived.
Upgrade Your Prep
Ready to go beyond free explanations?
LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.
Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal