Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: A politician claims we should ignore union leaders' warnings about multinational companies lowering wages because those leaders benefit from high wages and are therefore biased.

Conclusion: Legislators should disregard the arguments made by union leaders regarding multinational manufacturing control.

Reasoning: The union leaders have a personal financial interest in maintaining high wages, which motivates them to persuade legislators to oppose multinational control.

Analysis: This argument commits a classic source attack, also known as an ad hominem flaw. The politician focuses entirely on the union leaders' motives and potential bias rather than addressing the actual evidence or logic of their claims. Even if someone stands to benefit from a certain outcome, their factual observations about global wage trends could still be entirely accurate. Look for an answer that identifies this failure to address the substance of the argument instead of the person making it.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

19.

The reasoning in the politician's argument is flawed in that the argument

Correct Answer
C
The politician treats the leaders’ vested interest (circumstances potentially affecting their advocacy) as sufficient to discredit their argument, which is a classic circumstantial ad hominem.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep