ParadoxDiff: Easy

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Even though the government forced cars to drive slower on a major highway, people actually got to their destinations faster than before.

Reasoning: Lowering the maximum speed limit during rush hour resulted in faster overall travel times for commuters.

Analysis: The paradox here is that a lower speed limit—which intuitively should slow people down—actually resulted in faster travel times. To resolve this, we need a piece of information that explains how driving slower could increase efficiency. Perhaps the lower limit reduced the frequency of accidents that cause massive delays, or it smoothed out the 'stop-and-go' traffic flow that often plagues high-speed roads during rush hour. Look for an answer that addresses the mechanics of traffic flow rather than just the speed of individual cars.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

12.

Which one of the following, if true, most helps to explain the decrease in travel times described above?

Correct Answer
C
C directly resolves the paradox: previously, rush-hour accidents that caused long delays were common and driven by high speeds. Lowering the speed limit would reduce those accidents and delays, leading to shorter average travel times.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep