Flawed ReasoningDiff: Medium

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: A salesperson 'proves' their vacuum is better by showing it can pick up leftover dirt after a different vacuum already went over the spot once.

Conclusion: The Super XL is a superior vacuum cleaner compared to the customer's current model.

Reasoning: The Super XL was able to extract dirt from a carpet that the customer's old vacuum had already passed over once.

Analysis: The salesperson's 'test' is hilariously unfair because it lacks a control group. By running the Super XL second, they are essentially showing that two passes over a carpet pick up more than one pass—which would likely be true even if you used the old vacuum twice! Look for an answer that identifies this failure to account for the order of the trial or the cumulative nature of cleaning.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

10.

The vacuum cleaner salesperson's argument is most vulnerable to the criticism that it

Correct Answer
E
It identifies the order effect: had the Super XL been used first, the old vacuum might also have picked up leftover dirt. The salesperson’s test fails to control for order, so it doesn’t establish superiority.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep