Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Farmers used to use alfalfa to keep soil healthy, but they switched to chemical fertilizers and the soil got worse. The author says they have to quit the chemicals to fix the soil.

Conclusion: Farmers must stop using chemical fertilizers if they want to significantly improve the soil structure.

Reasoning: Chemical fertilizers caused farmers to stop planting 'green-manure' crops like alfalfa, which resulted in the current poor soil quality.

Analysis: The author assumes a 'one-or-the-other' relationship between chemical fertilizers and soil health. The premises show that chemicals *led* to the abandonment of alfalfa, but they don't prove that chemicals *prevent* soil improvement. The 'Gap' is the possibility that a farmer could use both chemical fertilizers and green-manure crops simultaneously. Look for a necessary assumption that states it is impossible to improve soil structure while still using chemical fertilizers.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

20.

The argument relies on the assumption that

Correct Answer
E
The conclusion that farmers will need to abandon chemical fertilizers to improve soil structure presupposes that farmers will not plant green-manure crops unless they stop using chemical fertilizers. If many farmers could or would grow green-manure while still using chemical fertilizers, then abandoning chemicals would not be necessary for improving soil structure. Thus E states the needed assumption. Negation test: If many farmers would grow green-manure without abandoning chemicals, the conclusion collapses.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep