WeakenDiff: Hardest
Logic Breakdown
Passage Summary: Archaeologists found a tiny stone head with an open mouth. They don't think it's a weapon because it's so small, so they assume it was used to signal whose turn it was to talk in a group.
Conclusion: The carved flint object found in the Stone Age tomb was likely the head of a communal speaking staff.
Reasoning: The object is too small to be a mace head, and its open-mouth design is a symbol for speaking.
Analysis: The argument relies on ruling out one possibility (a weapon) to favor another (a speaking staff). To weaken this, we should look for an answer that either makes the 'weapon' theory more plausible or provides a third, more likely alternative. Perhaps the object wasn't a functional tool at all, or maybe its small size didn't prevent it from being a weapon. Look for information that suggests the 'open mouth' symbol or the object's size is consistent with something other than a speaking staff.
Conclusion: The carved flint object found in the Stone Age tomb was likely the head of a communal speaking staff.
Reasoning: The object is too small to be a mace head, and its open-mouth design is a symbol for speaking.
Analysis: The argument relies on ruling out one possibility (a weapon) to favor another (a speaking staff). To weaken this, we should look for an answer that either makes the 'weapon' theory more plausible or provides a third, more likely alternative. Perhaps the object wasn't a functional tool at all, or maybe its small size didn't prevent it from being a weapon. Look for information that suggests the 'open mouth' symbol or the object's size is consistent with something other than a speaking staff.
Passage Stimulus
Passage Redacted
Unlock Full Passage19.Which one of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument?
Correct Answer
B
If communal objects were normally passed from one generation to the next, they would not typically be buried with an individual. Since the conclusion identifies the object as the head of a speaking staff and explicitly characterizes such a staff as communal, this fact makes it less likely that the tomb object was a speaking staff head, thereby weakening the argument.
Upgrade Your Prep
Ready to go beyond free explanations?
LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.
Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal