Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: An advertisement claims TekBank is the more expensive choice simply because it has ATM fees while GreenBank does not.

Conclusion: Banking at TekBank is more expensive than banking at GreenBank.

Reasoning: GreenBank offers free ATM use, whereas TekBank charges 25 cents per transaction.

Analysis: This argument suffers from a 'scope' or 'partial evidence' flaw. It assumes that one specific type of fee (ATM charges) represents the total cost of banking. It's a bit like saying one car is more expensive than another just because the windshield wipers cost more, while ignoring the price of the engine or the fuel efficiency. The advertisement fails to account for other potential costs like monthly maintenance fees, minimum balance requirements, or interest rates. Look for an answer that highlights this failure to consider other relevant financial factors.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

1.

The reasoning in the advertisement's argument is misleading in that the argument

Correct Answer
C
Correct. It concludes about the overall cost of banking based solely on the cost of one component (ATM transactions).
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep