Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Goblin ferns need a lot of dead leaves on the ground to survive. In places where these ferns are dying out, the leaf piles are thin and full of a specific type of earthworm that eats leaves, so the worms are likely to blame.

Conclusion: The European earthworm is likely the cause of the goblin fern's decline in North American forests.

Reasoning: Goblin ferns depend on thick leaf litter, and in areas where the ferns have vanished, the litter is thin and contains earthworms that consume such litter.

Analysis: The argument observes a correlation between the presence of worms, the thinning of leaves, and the disappearance of ferns to conclude a causal relationship. To make this argument hold water, the author must assume there isn't a third factor—like a change in soil chemistry or a different predator—killing the ferns and thinning the leaves simultaneously. We need to bridge the gap between 'the worms are there' and 'the worms are the reason the ferns are gone.' Look for an answer that confirms the worms didn't simply arrive after the ferns were already dead.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

19.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

Correct Answer
E
Negation test: If L. rubellus does favor habitats where the leaf litter is much thinner than what the fern requires, then its presence could be explained by an already-thin habitat, not by it causing the thinning. That would undercut the causal inference. So the argument depends on E.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep