Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Babies make random noises because they haven't learned how to move their mouths correctly yet; since mastering these movements takes years, the speaker concludes that talking is purely a physical skill.

Conclusion: Learning to speak is strictly a matter of developing physical muscle control rather than mental or abstract processing.

Reasoning: Infants lack the physical coordination to produce specific sounds, and it takes several years for children to master the motor skills required for language.

Analysis: This argument makes a massive leap from 'motor control is necessary' to 'motor control is the only thing involved.' To bridge this gap, the author must assume that there isn't a hidden mental or abstract process happening simultaneously that is independent of motor skills. We are looking for an answer that negates the possibility of a mental component being required for speech acquisition. If the argument is to hold, the author must believe that the physical ability to make sounds is the only hurdle to overcome.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

7.

Which one of the following is an assumption required by Gotera's argument?

Correct Answer
A
The argument requires that speech acquisition be only a function of one’s ability to produce speech sounds; otherwise, the conclusion that it is entirely motor (and not abstract/mental) would not follow. Negation test: if speech acquisition is not only a function of production ability, the conclusion fails.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep