Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Because scientists cite papers that were in the news, they must be choosing what to cite based on what's famous rather than what's actually good.

Conclusion: Medical researchers base their citations on media publicity rather than the actual scientific merit of the research.

Reasoning: Articles mentioned in popular media are more likely to be cited in subsequent medical journals than those that are not.

Analysis: The panelist is guilty of a classic correlation-versus-causation error. Just because media coverage and scientific citations happen together doesn't mean the media coverage caused the citations. It is entirely possible that a third factor—the actual importance of the research—causes both the newspapers to write about it and the scientists to cite it. Look for an answer that identifies this failure to consider an alternative explanation.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

4.

The panelist's argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it

Correct Answer
B
B identifies the key overlooked alternative: if the popular press actually selects the most important articles, then higher subsequent citations could reflect true importance rather than influence from publicity. That undermines the panelist’s causal and dismissive conclusion.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep