Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Since we used to think chocolate and olive oil were bad for us but now think they're good, it's only a matter of time before every food is labeled a health food.

Conclusion: Eventually, almost every food will be reported as having health benefits if we wait long enough.

Reasoning: Chocolate and oily foods like olive oil were once thought to be unhealthy but are now considered to have health benefits.

Analysis: The author is guilty of a massive overgeneralization based on a very small sample size. Just because scientific consensus shifted on two specific items—chocolate and olive oil—doesn't mean it will eventually shift for every other food, like deep-fried butter or lead paint. It’s a bit like seeing two people win the lottery and concluding that everyone will eventually be a millionaire if they just live long enough. Look for an answer choice that identifies this jump from a few specific cases to a universal rule.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

7.

The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument

Correct Answer
C
It correctly identifies a hasty generalization: moving from two examples to the sweeping claim that almost any food will eventually be reported to be healthful.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep