Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: People who punish their dogs have the naughtiest dogs, so the author thinks the punishment is making the dogs act out.

Conclusion: Disciplining a dog is counterproductive because it actually encourages the dog to misbehave.

Reasoning: There is a documented correlation where kennel club members who discipline their dogs more frequently also report higher levels of bad behavior.

Analysis: This argument falls into the classic trap of confusing correlation with causation. The author observes two things happening together—discipline and misbehavior—and assumes the discipline is the cause. However, it is far more likely that the misbehavior is the cause of the discipline; people generally don't discipline dogs that are behaving perfectly. Look for an answer that points out this 'reverse causation' error or suggests that the author has the relationship backward.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

5.

The argument is flawed in that it fails to consider the possibility that

Correct Answer
A
It identifies reverse causation: dogs’ misbehavior causes owners to discipline more. If so, the observed correlation does not show that discipline encourages misbehavior.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep