Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Fossilized tracks show a predator following a prey's every move; since modern hunters do this right before they pounce, scientists think this was a hunt caught in stone.

Conclusion: The predatory dinosaur was in the process of chasing the grazing dinosaur and likely attacked it immediately after the tracks were made.

Reasoning: The tracks show the predator matched the prey's turns and stride, a behavior seen in modern predators like lions just before they strike.

Analysis: The statement in question—that the predator followed and matched the stride—is an intermediate conclusion. It is a claim derived from the primary evidence (the 'tandem' turns in the tracks) which then serves as a premise for the final conclusion about the attack. When identifying roles, it is helpful to see this as a middle link in a chain of reasoning.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

4.

Which one of the following most accurately describes the role played in the argument by the statement that the predatory dinosaur was following the grazing dinosaur and had matched its stride?

Correct Answer
C
C correctly describes the statement as providing the basis for the analogy (to modern predators matching stride before striking) that supports the overall conclusion about a chase and attack.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep