ParadoxDiff: Hard

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: People who eat lots of beta-carotene-rich foods stay healthier over two decades, but people taking beta-carotene pills for a decade don't see any health benefits.

Reasoning: No reasoning (Fact Set).

Analysis: The paradox lies in the discrepancy between the health benefits of beta-carotene from food versus supplements. To resolve this, we need a difference between the two studies, such as the source of the nutrient (food vs. pill), the duration (24 years vs. 12 years), or the other nutrients present in food that might be missing in a supplement. Since this is an 'EXCEPT' question, the correct answer will be the one that fails to provide a relevant distinction or explanation for why the results differed. Don't be surprised if the 'EXCEPT' answer is a fact that applies equally to both groups, thereby explaining nothing.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

17.

Each of the following, if true, would help to resolve the apparent discrepancy between the results of the two studies EXCEPT:

Correct Answer
D
Saying that half the subjects in the 12-year study got supplements and half got a placebo just describes a standard control design; it doesn’t explain why supplements had no effect while high beta-carotene foods correlated with better outcomes. It provides no mechanism or confounder to reconcile the results.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep