Must be TrueDiff: Easy
Logic Breakdown
Passage Summary: Sodas don't list exact caffeine amounts. If they did, people could track their intake better, and if they could track it, they'd drink less and be healthier.
Reasoning: N/A
Analysis: This stimulus sets up a conditional chain: providing exact caffeine counts makes limiting intake easier, and making it easier leads to people actually limiting intake, which then leads to improved health. Since we are looking for what 'must be true,' we should look for an answer that connects the first part of the chain to the last. If the labels are changed to include exact caffeine, we can logically conclude that the health of many people would improve.
Reasoning: N/A
Analysis: This stimulus sets up a conditional chain: providing exact caffeine counts makes limiting intake easier, and making it easier leads to people actually limiting intake, which then leads to improved health. Since we are looking for what 'must be true,' we should look for an answer that connects the first part of the chain to the last. If the labels are changed to include exact caffeine, we can logically conclude that the health of many people would improve.
Passage Stimulus
Passage Redacted
Unlock Full Passage6.If all the statements above are true, which one of the following must be true?
Correct Answer
A
From the chain—listing exact caffeine makes limiting easier; many would limit; their health would improve—it necessarily follows that at least some people’s health would improve if exact caffeine content were listed.
Upgrade Your Prep
Ready to go beyond free explanations?
LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.
Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal