Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: A new medicine tastes gross, so it needs a special coating. It can't be a pill because it melts, and the company can't make gel caps, so it'll probably be a regular capsule.

Conclusion: Medication M will most likely be produced in capsule form.

Reasoning: Bad-tasting medications are usually made as tablets, capsules, or soft-gels; M cannot be a tablet due to heat sensitivity, and the company cannot produce soft-gels.

Analysis: This argument relies on a process of elimination among three specific options: tablets, capsules, and soft-gels. For the conclusion to be necessary, the argument must assume that there are no other viable forms for bad-tasting medications, such as liquids or powders. We are looking for an assumption that bridges the gap between the three listed options and the final choice of capsules.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

3.

The conclusion is most strongly supported by the reasoning in the argument if which one of the following is assumed?

Correct Answer
B
B is necessary: if M has an unpleasant taste, it falls under the rule limiting forms to tablet/capsule/soft-gel; eliminating tablets (heat issue) and soft-gels (no tech) makes capsules most likely. Negation test: if M does not have an unpleasant taste, many other forms (e.g., liquids) become plausible, and the capsule conclusion is no longer well supported.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep