Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: A college president thinks their low prices are making the school look bad to parents and students. He concludes that the only way to get more people to apply is to raise the price of tuition.

Conclusion: The university must raise its tuition and fees in order to expand its applicant pool.

Reasoning: The president suspects that the current low cost leads potential students to perceive the school as low quality, which is why the number of applicants is dropping.

Analysis: The president is jumping from a 'possible explanation' to a 'necessary solution.' This is a massive logical leap! For it to be true that they *need* to raise tuition, the president must assume that no other factors (like better marketing or improved facilities) could also increase the applicant pool. Furthermore, he assumes that the price-quality perception is actually a significant factor for the people they are trying to attract. If you negate the correct answer—saying, for example, that raising tuition would *not* change anyone's perception—the whole argument falls apart.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

25.

The university president's argument requires the assumption that

Correct Answer
A
A says the proposed explanation actually applies here. Negation test: If the explanation does not apply, then raising tuition wouldn’t target the cause of the decline, and the conclusion that we need to raise tuition to grow the pool collapses. So A is necessary.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep