Must be FalseDiff: Hard

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: There is a new law banning smoking at work to protect employees, but the law is written so that it can never be used to stop people from smoking in their own homes.

Reasoning: The law aims to protect workers from smoke, but its specific wording prevents it from ever being applied to smoking in private residences.

Analysis: For a 'Must be False' question, we are looking for a claim that the stimulus explicitly rules out. The commentator is very clear: the law *cannot* be interpreted as *ever* prohibiting smoking in homes. Therefore, any answer choice claiming that the law could be used to ban smoking in a home, or that a home could be classified as a 'workplace' under this law, must be rejected. We are looking for a direct violation of the rules established in the text.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

24.

The statements above, if true, provide a basis for rejecting which one of the following claims?

Correct Answer
E
Domestic workers’ workplaces are other people’s homes. Since the law cannot be interpreted to prohibit smoking in private homes, it cannot protect domestic workers from secondhand smoke in those workplaces. Thus, E must be rejected.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep