Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Ice cream sales are down and cheese sales are up. Since both have calcium, the author concludes people are swapping their ice cream for cheese to get their nutrients.

Conclusion: People are increasingly choosing to get their calcium from cheddar cheese instead of ice cream.

Reasoning: Ice cream sales have declined over the last decade while cheddar cheese sales have doubled, and both are sources of calcium.

Analysis: The author is guilty of a 'correlation does not equal causation' error, specifically assuming a specific motivation for a change in consumer behavior. Just because two trends happen at the same time doesn't mean one is causing the other, or that they are linked by a desire for calcium. Look for an answer that highlights the failure to consider alternative explanations, such as cheese becoming cheaper or people simply liking cheese more for reasons unrelated to calcium. The author assumes a level of nutritional intentionality in shoppers that the evidence doesn't support.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

8.

The reasoning above is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it

Correct Answer
B
B identifies the key flaw: the argument does not consider other explanations for declining ice cream sales, yet infers a calcium-motivated shift to cheddar.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep