Flawed ReasoningDiff: Hardest

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: An investigator found that 20 percent of the samples they tested were broken. Because the contract says only 5 percent can be broken, they concluded the company is breaking the rules.

Conclusion: The supplier has breached their contract regarding the maximum allowable defect rate.

Reasoning: A lab test of specific samples sent by field inspectors showed a 20 percent defect rate, which is much higher than the 5 percent limit allowed in the contract.

Analysis: The flaw here is a classic sampling error. The investigator is assuming that the samples sent by field inspectors are representative of the entire production run. If inspectors specifically look for and send back items they suspect are broken, a 20 percent defect rate in those samples doesn't mean the overall defect rate is over 5 percent. Look for an answer that points out the samples might not be a fair representation of all the products manufactured.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

20.

The reasoning in the quality control investigator's argument is flawed in that the argument

Correct Answer
D
D identifies the core sampling flaw: if inspectors preferentially select items they suspect are defective, the observed 20% could be much higher than the true defect rate, so the conclusion of a contract violation isn’t warranted.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep