Passage Summary: Chiu argues that you shouldn't be blamed for how you feel because you can't always help your feelings, and you're only responsible for things you can actually control.

Conclusion: It is incorrect to believe that individuals are always morally at fault for experiencing specific emotions.

Reasoning: Responsibility only applies to things within a person's control, and the experience of certain emotions is not always a controllable event.

Analysis: We have a clear logical chain: Blameworthy -> Responsible -> Under Control. The argument states: Not always under control -> Not always responsible -> Not always blameworthy. To make this airtight, we need to ensure that 'blameworthy' and 'responsible' are linked in the way the author assumes. Look for an answer that explicitly connects being morally blameworthy for something to having control over that thing.