Flawed ReasoningDiff: Hardest
Logic Breakdown
Passage Summary: People think poor politicians sell out to rich donors, but that's wrong because there are rich people in every political party.
Conclusion: The belief that non-wealthy candidates compromise their views to gain support from wealthy patrons is incorrect.
Reasoning: Wealthy individuals are distributed across all political parties in roughly the same proportion as they are in the general population.
Analysis: The author assumes that because the 'wealthy' as a group are politically diverse, they cannot exert a specific, compromising influence on individual candidates. This ignores the fact that a candidate doesn't need 'the wealthy' as a whole; they need specific wealthy donors who likely have specific demands. Even if there are rich people in every party, a candidate might still change their tune to please the specific rich people in *their* party. Look for an answer that points out that group-level distribution doesn't prevent individual-level influence.
Conclusion: The belief that non-wealthy candidates compromise their views to gain support from wealthy patrons is incorrect.
Reasoning: Wealthy individuals are distributed across all political parties in roughly the same proportion as they are in the general population.
Analysis: The author assumes that because the 'wealthy' as a group are politically diverse, they cannot exert a specific, compromising influence on individual candidates. This ignores the fact that a candidate doesn't need 'the wealthy' as a whole; they need specific wealthy donors who likely have specific demands. Even if there are rich people in every party, a candidate might still change their tune to please the specific rich people in *their* party. Look for an answer that points out that group-level distribution doesn't prevent individual-level influence.
Passage Stimulus
Passage Redacted
Unlock Full Passage22.The argument is vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it fails to consider that
Correct Answer
B
B points out that party-endorsed positions might be much less varied than individual candidates' positions. That undermines the author's inference: even with wealth spread across parties, candidates could still need to compromise to match party-favored positions that attract wealthy donors.
Upgrade Your Prep
Ready to go beyond free explanations?
LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.
Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal