Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Laws only really work if there is someone like the police to enforce them; since the world doesn't have a global police force, international laws aren't actually effective.

Conclusion: International law does not qualify as effective law.

Reasoning: Effective law requires an enforcement mechanism like a police force, but there is currently no international police force in existence.

Analysis: The author is operating under a very 'might makes right' philosophy here, assuming that a police force is the only way to achieve effective enforcement. To find the necessary assumption, we need to bridge the gap between the lack of a 'police force' and the lack of 'effective enforcement.' The argument falls apart if there are other ways to enforce international rules, such as economic sanctions or diplomatic pressure. Look for an answer choice that confirms a police force is the only possible mechanism for making a law effective.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

12.

Which one of the following is an assumption required by the editorial's argument?

Correct Answer
E
It states the needed bridge: only an international police force could effectively enforce international law. Negation test: if something else could enforce it effectively, then the absence of an international police force wouldn’t show international law is ineffective, undermining the argument.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep