Flawed ReasoningDiff: Hardest

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Critics say calculators make kids bad at math, but they're wrong because people have been complaining about new technology since the invention of the alphabet.

Conclusion: The claim that calculators will damage students' understanding of mathematical principles is false.

Reasoning: Similar accusations have been made about every new information technology in history, such as ancient Greek concerns that writing would destroy memory.

Analysis: This argument falls into the trap of assuming that because people were wrong about a similar issue in the past, they must be wrong about this specific issue now. Just because the Greeks were overreacting about the 'dangers' of writing doesn't mean modern critics are overreacting about calculators. The author is dismissing a specific concern based on a historical pattern rather than addressing the actual merits of the critics' claims. Look for an answer that points out this failure to address the specific case at hand.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

18.

The reasoning in the argument above is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that the argument

Correct Answer
A
A identifies the flaw: the argument’s only evidence is that similar accusations have been made in the past, which by itself does not show the current accusation is false. The relevance of that historical pattern to the truth of the present claim is not established.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep