Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Anna mentions an ancient scholar's theory on rainbows. William dismisses the theory entirely just because the scholar also believed in monsters and weird medical cures.

Conclusion: Pliny the Elder's claim regarding the position of rainbows in the sky is incorrect.

Reasoning: Pliny the Elder is an unreliable source because he also made absurd claims about mythical creatures and bizarre medical remedies.

Analysis: This is a classic Ad Hominem or 'Source Character' flaw. William is attacking Pliny's general credibility rather than addressing the specific claim about rainbows. Just because someone is wrong about dog-headed people doesn't mean they are wrong about basic meteorology. Look for an answer that points out the error of rejecting a specific claim based solely on the unreliability of the person making it. It's a bit like saying a chef can't tell you the time because they once burnt a soufflé—the two things aren't necessarily related.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

1.

William's argument against Anna's claims about rainbows is most vulnerable to criticism because it

Correct Answer
C
It identifies the ad hominem-by-association move: inferring that because Pliny made some incorrect assertions, his assertion about rainbows must also be incorrect. That attacks the source’s track record instead of engaging the rainbow claim itself.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep