PrincipleDiff: Medium

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Even though credit card companies let you skip a bill, you shouldn't do it because you'll end up paying way more in interest later.

Conclusion: It is almost never in a cardholder's interest to take advantage of skipped-payment offers.

Reasoning: Skipping payments causes finance charges to accumulate, resulting in a much higher total cost to the cardholder over time.

Analysis: This argument is based on a principle of long-term financial prudence. It suggests that an immediate, short-term convenience should be avoided if it leads to a significantly greater long-term cost. When looking for a similar principle, prioritize scenarios where a seemingly beneficial 'break' or 'shortcut' is rejected because the eventual price tag—be it financial, physical, or professional—is too high. The logic is essentially: 'Don't trade tomorrow's stability for today's ease.'

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

18.

Which one of the following arguments illustrates a principle most similar to the principle underlying the argument above?

Correct Answer
C
Using highway maintenance funds for new roads brings an immediate benefit, but failure to maintain roads now causes greater total maintenance costs later. That mirrors: short-term gain causing accumulating long-run costs, so it’s unwise—just like skipping payments.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep