Flawed ReasoningDiff: Medium

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: If Agnes gets her way, a lab needs cleaning. The director likes her proposal. The author concludes the lab will definitely be cleaned because the director's support ensures approval.

Conclusion: The fourth-floor lab must be cleaned out.

Reasoning: If Agnes's proposal is approved, the lab must be cleaned; the director supports both Agnes's and Immanuel's proposals, and only supported proposals are approved.

Analysis: The argument stumbles on a classic conditional logic error. It states that director support is a necessary condition for approval ('Only those...'), but then treats it as a sufficient condition (assuming support guarantees approval). Just because the director likes a proposal doesn't mean it's officially green-lit; there could be budget cuts or other hurdles. Look for an answer that identifies this confusion between what is required for an outcome and what guarantees it.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

15.

The argument's reasoning is flawed because the argument

Correct Answer
B
Saying the argument fails to consider that a proposal could be rejected even with the director’s support pinpoints the necessary/sufficient error: support is necessary for approval, not sufficient.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep