Passage Summary: Even though we know bridges with lots of 'stress points' are more likely to break, they strangely don't break at those specific spots; they break somewhere else.

Reasoning: Bridges with many high-stress points are prone to breaking, yet the actual breaks occur in areas of the bridge that are not designated as high-stress.

Analysis: We have a classic spatial discrepancy: the indicator (high-stress points) predicts the event (fracture), but doesn't mark the location. To resolve this, we need a reason why high-stress points cause trouble somewhere else or why they themselves are protected while other areas are vulnerable. Perhaps the high-stress points are reinforced so well that they become the strongest parts, forcing the 'weak link' to shift to a different spot. Look for an answer that explains why the stress is transferred or why the non-stress points are actually more fragile.