Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: A politician claims we shouldn't cut social programs because the real reason the government is broke is because of overpaid bureaucrats and politicians.

Conclusion: It is unjustified to reduce social spending.

Reasoning: The primary cause of deficit spending is actually a bloated government bureaucracy and self-interested politicians, rather than excessive social expenditures.

Analysis: The politician is attempting to distract us with a classic red herring. Just because bureaucracy is a 'main cause' of the deficit doesn't mean that social spending isn't also a contributing factor or a legitimate place to find savings. In the world of political debate, pointing at one problem to avoid talking about another is common, but logically, it's a failure to address the opponent's specific argument. Look for an answer that identifies this failure to show that the two causes are mutually exclusive.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

17.

A reasoning flaw in the politician's argument is that the argument

Correct Answer
A
A is correct because the politician does not grapple with the substance of the opponents’ theoretical case for cutting social spending, but instead diverts attention to a different alleged cause of deficits and then declares cuts unwarranted.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep