Passage Summary: In a study, witnesses were first pushed to lie by one lawyer and then encouraged to fix those lies by a second lawyer. Surprisingly, the people who were the most accurate during the first round were the least accurate during the second round.

Reasoning: No reasoning provided.

Analysis: We are looking for a reason why the most 'honest' witnesses in the first round became the most 'inaccurate' in the second. It is a strange inverse relationship. Perhaps the witnesses who resisted the first lawyer's influence were simply more stubborn about their initial testimony, making them less likely to accept corrections—even valid ones—from the second lawyer. Look for an answer that explains why being accurate initially might lead to a failure to correct details later.