Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: A bird expert claims a species isn't vegetarian because he watched them eat mostly bugs every morning for a few months.

Conclusion: The belief that this bird species primarily eats vegetation is incorrect.

Reasoning: Observations made every morning over several months showed that more than 50% of the birds' diet consisted of animal sources.

Analysis: The ornithologist is making a sweeping claim about the species' entire diet based on a very specific, limited window of observation. The flaw lies in the sampling: the expert only watched the birds in the morning. It is entirely possible that these birds have a high-protein breakfast of insects but spend the rest of the day grazing on plants. Look for an answer that highlights this potential lack of representativeness in the data collected.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

6.

The reasoning in the ornithologist's argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that the argument

Correct Answer
D
D identifies the unaddressed possibility that birds eat differently at other times of day or at night, undermining the inference from morning-only observations to an all-purpose dietary claim.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep