Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: A doctor says that since being a little overweight is better than being very underweight, just being a little overweight is enough to make you healthy.

Conclusion: Being slightly overweight is all that is required for a person to be healthy.

Reasoning: Research indicates that people who are slightly overweight have better health outcomes than those who are significantly underweight.

Analysis: The doctor makes a massive leap from a relative comparison to an absolute requirement. Just because Group A is healthier than Group B doesn't mean Group A is 'healthy' in an absolute sense, nor does it mean that being in Group A is the only thing needed for health. It's a bit like saying that because a bicycle is faster than walking, owning a bicycle suffices for winning the Tour de France. Look for an answer that points out this confusion between 'better than' and 'sufficient for.'

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

22.

The argument's reasoning is flawed because the argument

Correct Answer
E
The argument mistakes a merely relative property (“slightly overweight” is healthier than “considerably underweight”) for an absolute one (“healthy”) and treats it as sufficient for health. Being healthier than a worse alternative doesn’t guarantee being healthy.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep