Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: The law says car factories must be 'Class B,' and 'Class B' factories aren't allowed to delay inspections, so car factories can't delay inspections.

Conclusion: Automobile factories are not permitted to postpone their safety inspections under the Factory Safety Act.

Reasoning: The Act requires all automobile factories to be registered as Class B, and it also states that no Class B factory can postpone its inspections.

Analysis: The argument uses a deductive structure to reach its conclusion. It identifies a specific group (automobile factories) and notes that they must meet a certain condition (Class B status). It then identifies a requirement for that status (punctual inspections). By linking these two rules, the author demonstrates that the requirement for the subgroup is a necessary consequence of the broader regulations. To identify the method of reasoning, look for a description of how the author applies a general rule to a specific case through an intermediate requirement.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

15.

The argument proceeds by

Correct Answer
A
The argument combines two provisions—auto factories must be class B, and class B requires punctual inspections—to conclude that postponing inspections is not allowed. That’s exactly “pointing out how two provisions jointly entail the unacceptability of a certain state of affairs.”
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep