Must be FalseDiff: Hardest

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Sweet drinks can be good for athletes because they encourage drinking and help the body absorb water, but drinking too much sugar actually causes the body to lose water and get more dehydrated.

Reasoning: Sugared drinks can help hydration and energy, but excessive sugar intake reverses this benefit by pulling water from the blood into the stomach, worsening dehydration.

Analysis: In a 'Must be False' question, we are looking for a statement that directly contradicts the rules established in the stimulus. The text provides a nuanced view: sugar is helpful in small amounts but harmful in large amounts regarding hydration. An answer choice that claims large amounts of sugar never contribute to dehydration, or that sugar has no beneficial effects on water absorption, would be impossible given these premises. Focus on identifying a choice that ignores the 'tipping point' where sugar stops being helpful and starts being harmful.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

21.

If the statements above are true, then each of the following could also be true EXCEPT:

Correct Answer
B
This says dehydration problems are invariably worsened whenever substances that delay muscle fatigue are consumed. That contradicts the passage’s explicit claim that small amounts of sugar both delay fatigue and enhance water absorption—helping, not worsening, dehydration.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep