Point at IssueDiff: Easy

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Megan thinks people only want to be rich to show off. Channen says people might just want to buy stuff for themselves, regardless of what the neighbors think.

Reasoning: Megan claims status is the only reason for excess wealth; Channen argues that the utility of money for buying goods is a reason independent of status.

Analysis: Use the 'Agree/Disagree' test to find the point of contention. Megan believes that status is a necessary condition for pursuing wealth beyond basic needs. Channen explicitly disagrees, arguing that the desire for material goods is a sufficient alternative motivation. The point of contention is whether status is the only motivator for accumulating extra wealth.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

10.

Megan and Channen disagree over whether

Correct Answer
E
It directly captures the dispute over whether the motive for pursuing wealth beyond basic needs can ever be anything other than prestige. Megan: No. Channen: Yes.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep