Most Strongly SupportedDiff: Easy
Logic Breakdown
Passage Summary: Big animals eat a ton, so when the weather ruins the food supply, they die out faster than little animals who don't need as much to survive.
Reasoning: Large animals require massive food intake, making them vulnerable during climate shifts, whereas small animals need less food to maintain populations.
Analysis: Treat the premises as absolute facts and look for a statement that follows logically from them. The stimulus establishes a direct link between body size, food requirements, and extinction risk during environmental stress. An ideal answer will likely suggest that smaller food requirements provide a survival advantage during periods of climatic deterioration.
Reasoning: Large animals require massive food intake, making them vulnerable during climate shifts, whereas small animals need less food to maintain populations.
Analysis: Treat the premises as absolute facts and look for a statement that follows logically from them. The stimulus establishes a direct link between body size, food requirements, and extinction risk during environmental stress. An ideal answer will likely suggest that smaller food requirements provide a survival advantage during periods of climatic deterioration.
Passage Stimulus
Passage Redacted
Unlock Full Passage9.The statements above, if true, most support which one of the following?
Correct Answer
B
It cautiously captures the supported link: how much food individuals require contributes to species’ vulnerability to extinction. This matches “helps make large-animal species more vulnerable.”
Upgrade Your Prep
Ready to go beyond free explanations?
LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.
Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal