Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary:

Conclusion: Prohibiting the sale of thangkas to tourists would lead to the death of the art form.

Reasoning: Young artists depend on sales to survive, and if they cannot sell to tourists, they will abandon the craft for more profitable art forms.

Analysis: Yvette counters Xavier’s elitist 'quality control' plan by pointing out the harsh economic reality of the art world. While Xavier is worried about the 'purity' of the art, Yvette is worried about the artists having to eat. She uses a causal prediction to show that Xavier's solution would actually accelerate the very 'dying art form' he is trying to save. Look for an answer that describes her method as identifying an unintended, devastating consequence of a proposed policy.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

3.

Yvette responds to Xavier by

Correct Answer
C
C accurately captures Yvette’s move: she argues that Xavier’s proposed prohibition would lead to the very outcome it is meant to avoid—the further decline/death of the art form.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep