Passage Summary: If people get away with breaking rules, they lose their moral compass and everything turns into a mess, so we have to punish every single rule-breaker.

Conclusion: A society must ensure that every instance of rule-breaking is punished.

Reasoning: Unpunished violations lead to a lack of moral guidance, which in turn causes chaos.

Analysis: The argument suffers from a 'perfectionist' or 'all-or-nothing' flaw. The premise states that if violations 'routinely' go unpunished, chaos ensues, but the conclusion jumps to the extreme claim that 'any' instance of impunity must be avoided. There is a significant logical gap between 'routine' impunity and a single instance of it. You should look for an answer that identifies this leap from a general trend (routine) to an absolute requirement (never).