Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Someone argues that if you hate gas cars for polluting, you shouldn't buy an electric car from a company that also makes gas cars, because you're still supporting them.

Conclusion: If gas-powered cars are morally wrong to own, then owning an electric car from a company that also produces gas cars is also wrong.

Reasoning: Buying an electric car provides financial support to a manufacturer that continues to produce the very products the buyer finds objectionable.

Analysis: The advocate is attempting to trap the car owner in a moral inconsistency. To justify this logic, we need a principle that links the act of purchasing a 'good' product with the moral stain of the company's 'bad' products. It's the ultimate 'guilt by association' for your wallet. Look for an answer that suggests one should not financially support an entity that engages in any behavior one deems unacceptable.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

18.

Which one of the following principles, if valid, would most help to justify the advocate's reasoning?

Correct Answer
D
It supplies the needed bridge: if you believe an organization does something wrong, you should not support it. That justifies concluding the person shouldn’t buy even the electric car from a company that also makes gasoline cars the person believes are wrong.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep