Necessary AssumptionDiff: Hardest
Logic Breakdown
Passage Summary: People who hide their feelings—whether they mean to or not—get a fast heartbeat, so the author thinks the act of hiding the feelings is what causes the heart to race.
Conclusion: The physical act of holding back emotional displays is what triggers a significant increase in heart rate.
Reasoning: Both people who hide emotions automatically and people who hide them on purpose experience the same spike in heart rate during emotional events.
Analysis: The argument identifies a correlation between inhibition and heart rate and concludes that inhibition is the cause. However, it overlooks the possibility that the 'emotion-provoking situation' itself is causing the heart rate to rise independently of the inhibition. For the conclusion to hold, it must be true that the heart rate wouldn't jump just from the emotional stress alone. We need an assumption that rules out the external situation as the sole cause of the physiological spike.
Conclusion: The physical act of holding back emotional displays is what triggers a significant increase in heart rate.
Reasoning: Both people who hide emotions automatically and people who hide them on purpose experience the same spike in heart rate during emotional events.
Analysis: The argument identifies a correlation between inhibition and heart rate and concludes that inhibition is the cause. However, it overlooks the possibility that the 'emotion-provoking situation' itself is causing the heart rate to rise independently of the inhibition. For the conclusion to hold, it must be true that the heart rate wouldn't jump just from the emotional stress alone. We need an assumption that rules out the external situation as the sole cause of the physiological spike.
Passage Stimulus
Passage Redacted
Unlock Full Passage22.Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?
Correct Answer
A
A is necessary. If encountering an emotion-provoking situation were sufficient to cause nonrepressors’ heart rates to rise sharply, the rise could be explained without inhibition, undermining the conclusion that inhibiting the display is what causes the increase. Negation test: if encountering is sufficient, the argument falls apart.
Upgrade Your Prep
Ready to go beyond free explanations?
LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.
Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal