Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Some rules are so important for a society to work that you have to follow them even if it's bad for you personally.

Reasoning: Duties are defined as rules so fundamental that individual self-interest cannot override the obligation to follow them.

Analysis: This stimulus sets up a hierarchy where social duty sits firmly on top of individual self-interest. Since we are completing the argument, we need a statement that flows naturally from the idea that duties are non-negotiable for the sake of society. Look for an answer that suggests social stability requires individuals to occasionally act against their own best interests. It’s the classic 'needs of the many' logic—sometimes you have to keep your word even if it means losing a few bucks.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

13.

Which one of the following most reasonably completes the argument?

Correct Answer
C
Because duties bind even when they conflict with self-interest, societies must recognize that such conflicts are possible. Choice C states exactly that recognition.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep