Point at IssueDiff: Hard

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Dana says teachers should always use the learning style a child is used to, but Pat says that's not always right because kids need to learn how to be flexible for the real world.

Reasoning: No reasoning (Fact Set).

Analysis: The disagreement centers on the word 'always.' Dana argues that a child's accustomed style should be the absolute dictator of the teaching method used. Pat explicitly rejects this 'always' stance, suggesting that teaching methods should sometimes challenge children to learn in new ways to build flexibility. To find the point at issue, apply the 'Agree/Disagree' test: Dana would agree that the accustomed style should be the sole factor, while Pat would disagree, citing the value of learning multiple skills. It's a classic clash between catering to current comfort and preparing for future demands.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

20.

The conversation lends the most support to the claim that Dana and Pat disagree on which one of the following?

Correct Answer
B
B captures the core disagreement. Pat affirms that all children should learn to adapt to various methods (flexibility is invaluable). Dana’s “always” tailoring to the accustomed style implies rejecting that universal flexibility requirement.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep