Flawed ReasoningDiff: Hardest

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Fixing puppies too early can cause bone problems and arthritis, so you should wait until they are adults to have the procedure done.

Conclusion: To prevent arthritis in dogs, owners should wait until the animal is fully grown before neutering it.

Reasoning: Neutering puppies early interferes with bone development, and poor bone development is a known cause of arthritis later in life.

Analysis: The trainer identifies a causal link between early neutering and arthritis but assumes that delaying the procedure is the only or best way to 'protect' the dog. This argument is vulnerable because it ignores other potential causes of arthritis or the possibility that delaying neutering could cause even worse health problems. Look for an answer that points out this narrow focus on one specific cause while ignoring broader health consequences. It's a classic case of 'the cure might be worse than the disease'—or at least, we don't know if it isn't.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

22.

Of the following, which one is a criticism to which the reasoning in the trainer's argument is most vulnerable?

Correct Answer
C
C correctly points out the core gap: the argument never addresses whether neutering in middle or late puppyhood avoids the bone-development risk. It generalizes from “early puppyhood” to “until full-grown” without support.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep