Passage Summary: Rossi argues that because children have unique interests not covered by their parents, they must be allowed to vote to ensure the government remains truly democratic.

Conclusion: Children should be granted the right to vote.

Reasoning: It is undemocratic for people to live under a government that does not represent their interests, and children have interests that differ from their parents'.

Analysis: Rossi's argument is structured as a application of a general principle to a specific group. He starts with a broad definition of what makes a government 'undemocratic' (lack of representation) and then provides evidence that children fit the criteria of an unrepresented group. Since the question asks for the 'Method of Reasoning,' you should focus on this structural flow: establishing a necessary condition for democracy and then arguing that a specific change is required to meet that condition. We aren't critiquing the logic here, just identifying how the pieces fit together.