StrengthenDiff: Easy

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Parents want manufacturers to sell headphones that automatically turn off if the music is too loud to protect kids' ears. However, the author argues this won't work because teenagers buy their own gear and probably won't pick the 'safe' versions.

Conclusion: The parents' proposal to include auto-shutoff headphones in product lines will likely fail to significantly lower hearing loss rates among teenagers.

Reasoning: Because teenagers typically purchase their own headphones, they will likely choose models without the safety feature that limits volume.

Analysis: The argument hinges on the assumption that if teenagers are the ones making the purchase, they will actively avoid or ignore the safety-enhanced models. To strengthen this claim, we need to bridge the gap between 'teenagers buy them' and 'the problem won't be solved.' Look for an answer choice that suggests teenagers prioritize high volume over safety or that the market will still offer plenty of non-restricted options. It is a classic case of consumer behavior potentially undermining a public health initiative.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

7.

Which one of the following, if true, provides the most support for the argument?

Correct Answer
D
D strengthens the argument by showing that teens who currently listen at dangerous levels do so deliberately despite knowing the risks. Combined with the fact that teens buy their own headphones, this makes it likely they will avoid auto-off models, so the recommendation won’t significantly reduce hearing loss.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep