Flawed ReasoningDiff: Medium

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Bicycles failed at first but became popular later. Since technology only catches on when it matches what society cares about, the people in the 1860s must have had different values than the people in 1817.

Conclusion: A change in societal values must have occurred between 1817 and the 1860s.

Reasoning: Technology is only accepted if it aligns with values, and bicycles were accepted in the 1860s after being rejected earlier.

Analysis: This argument suffers from a classic 'necessary vs. sufficient' confusion. The author states that matching values is a requirement (necessary condition) for acceptance, but then treats it as the only possible reason (sufficient condition) for why acceptance changed. Perhaps the values stayed the same, but the bicycle technology itself improved or became cheaper. Look for an answer that points out the author ignores other possible explanations for why the bicycle became popular later.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

25.

The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument

Correct Answer
E
The argument jumps from “acceptance requires value coherence” to “values must have changed” while ignoring other reasons for the initial failure (e.g., design, cost, safety). That’s exactly what E calls out: it ignores plausible alternative explanations for why bicycles weren’t accepted earlier.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep