Flawed ReasoningDiff: Hard
Logic Breakdown
Passage Summary: After a computer chip failed, a spokesperson claimed it won't happen again because computers are designing the new chips. They believe that because humans aren't doing the manual work, the process is now perfect.
Conclusion: There is no possibility that future microprocessor designs will contain flaws.
Reasoning: Because modern microprocessors are now designed entirely by computers rather than being checked manually by humans, design errors will be eliminated.
Analysis: The spokesperson is making a massive leap from 'computers are doing the designing' to 'the design will be perfect.' This ignores the possibility that the computer programs used for the design could themselves have bugs or that the automated process could produce errors. When an argument claims something is 'guaranteed' or has 'no chance' of failure based on a change in method, look for an answer that points out the new method might have its own set of problems. The flaw lies in assuming that automation is synonymous with infallibility.
Conclusion: There is no possibility that future microprocessor designs will contain flaws.
Reasoning: Because modern microprocessors are now designed entirely by computers rather than being checked manually by humans, design errors will be eliminated.
Analysis: The spokesperson is making a massive leap from 'computers are doing the designing' to 'the design will be perfect.' This ignores the possibility that the computer programs used for the design could themselves have bugs or that the automated process could produce errors. When an argument claims something is 'guaranteed' or has 'no chance' of failure based on a change in method, look for an answer that points out the new method might have its own set of problems. The flaw lies in assuming that automation is synonymous with infallibility.
Passage Stimulus
Passage Redacted
Unlock Full Passage20.The industry spokesperson's argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it
Correct Answer
E
The spokesperson assumes computers are not liable to error, so computer-designed chips cannot be flawed. That unjustified assumption supports the extreme “no chance” claim and is contradicted by the very idea that computers can process information incorrectly.
Upgrade Your Prep
Ready to go beyond free explanations?
LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.
Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal