StrengthenDiff: Easy
Logic Breakdown
Passage Summary: A family comes home to broken bottles and suspects local kids snuck in through an unlocked door to raid the fridge, even though their cat was home alone the whole time.
Conclusion: The mess in the kitchen was caused by neighborhood children who entered through an unlocked back door rather than by the family cat.
Reasoning: There were no signs of a break-in or theft, and the family suspects they left a door unlocked, providing an opportunity for children to enter and accidentally break bottles while looking for food.
Analysis: Since this is a 'Strengthen EXCEPT' question, four of the answers will provide evidence that makes the 'neighborhood children' theory more likely or the 'cat' theory less likely. We are looking for the one answer that either does nothing for the hypothesis or actually makes the cat look more suspicious. When evaluating the options, keep an eye out for details that confirm the door was actually open, that children were seen in the area, or that the cat is physically unable to knock over heavy bottles. The correct answer will be the one that fails to help the Fenwicks' case against the kids.
Conclusion: The mess in the kitchen was caused by neighborhood children who entered through an unlocked back door rather than by the family cat.
Reasoning: There were no signs of a break-in or theft, and the family suspects they left a door unlocked, providing an opportunity for children to enter and accidentally break bottles while looking for food.
Analysis: Since this is a 'Strengthen EXCEPT' question, four of the answers will provide evidence that makes the 'neighborhood children' theory more likely or the 'cat' theory less likely. We are looking for the one answer that either does nothing for the hypothesis or actually makes the cat look more suspicious. When evaluating the options, keep an eye out for details that confirm the door was actually open, that children were seen in the area, or that the cat is physically unable to knock over heavy bottles. The correct answer will be the one that fails to help the Fenwicks' case against the kids.
Passage Stimulus
Passage Redacted
Unlock Full Passage2.Each of the following, if true, helps to support the Fenwicks' hypothesis EXCEPT:
Correct Answer
E
Returning later than planned does not connect to an unlocked back door, children entering, or why bottles were broken. It does nothing to make the kids-through-the-back-door hypothesis more likely, so it is the EXCEPT.
Upgrade Your Prep
Ready to go beyond free explanations?
LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.
Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal